State of Washington

Ethics Advisory Committee

Opinion 89-13

Question

May a court commissioner hear any matters in which the attorney who represents the commissioner in a lawsuit in the commissioner's personal capacity is involved? May a court commissioner hear any matters in which the attorney for the opposing counsel in the lawsuit against the commissioner is involved? May a court commissioner hear any matters in which the attorney is associated with either the commissioner's attorney or associated with opposing counsel?

Answer

CJC Canon 3(C) requires judges to disqualify themselves in a proceeding in which their impartiality might reasonably be questioned. Therefore, a court commissioner may not hear any matters which are not agreed (whether the same be actively contested or any posture of default) in which the attorney who represents the commissioner in a lawsuit in the commissioner's personal capacity is involved or the opposing counsel in the lawsuit is involved. This restriction shall apply while the lawsuit is pending or for a reasonable period of time after its termination. The type of lawsuit is not relevant to the issue of disqualification. The court commissioner may hear matters in which the attorney is associated with either the commissioner's attorney or opposing counsel if 1) the commissioner discloses on the record the relationship to the commissioner's attorney or opposing counsel, 2) that attorney is not associated in any way with the commissioner's lawsuit and the commissioner's attorney or opposing counsel have not been involved in the matter before the commissioner, and 3) offers to recuse. The commissioner may enter all agreed orders brought by the commissioner's attorney, opposing counsel, or any of their associates.

NOTE: Effective June 23, 1995, the Supreme Court amended the Code of Judicial Conduct. In addition to reviewing the ethics advisory opinions, the following should be noted:

Opinion 89-13—CJC Canon 3(C) became 3(D).

The Supreme Court adopted a new Code of Judicial Conduct effective January 1, 2011. In addition to reviewing the ethics advisory opinions, the following should be noted:

CJC 2.11

Opinion 89-13

06/15/1989

 

Privacy and Disclaimer NoticesSitemap

© Copyright 2024. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.

S5